If a defender scores, then in a sense, they have eliminated or "neutralized" the same number of points allowed.
For example, let’s say the opponent scores a TD. It is now 7-0. However, the next time our defense plays, they intercept and return for a TD. Now, it’s 7-7 which is equal to the same points margin of 0-0. It’s the same as if the opponent never scored in the first place.
So, I propose that defensive points be subtracted from Points Allowed rather than add them to Points For only for the purpose of evaluating and comparing the teams in terms of the offense scoring and the defense preventing or reducing the effect of points allowed.
If we were to do this now, where would this defense rank among the league?
By virtue of their 4 TD’s, 3 from INT’s and 1 from a fumble return, the Cowboys defense is ranked #1, averaging 12.9 points allowed per game. This is a full two points less than the 2nd place Ravens, who allow 14.9 points per game.
Another thing that should be re-evaluated is the effect of the change in field position after a turnover. There has been 9 times that the Cowboys offense got the ball after a turnover by their opponent and the average starting point is their own 47 yard line, practically midfield.
Unfortunately, the Cowboys offense has taken little advantage of this field position, scoring one TD and three FG’s. Compare that to the Eagles four TD’s and two FG’s off the same number of turnovers.
The best circumstances for an offense has been the 49ers. Their defense has gifted them 13 times with an average starting point on their opponents 44 yard line. This resulted in three TD’s and four FG’s. This seems more impressive than the Cowboys until you remember that the Cowboys defense returned 4 additional turnovers for TD’s.
